Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. The presentation of self in everyday life. Awareness contexts and social interaction. Subject-coded versus researcher-coded TST protocols: some methodological implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2015.įranklin BJ, Kohout FJ. Players and pawns: how chess builds community and culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press 2001.įine GA. Giften tongues: high school debate and adolescent culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1998.įine GA. Berkeley: University of California Press 1996.įine GA. Kitchens: the culture of restaurant work. The qualitative content analysis process. Autoethnography, personal narrative, and reflexivity: researcher as subject. New York: Academic 1984.Įllis C, Bochner AP. The third party standpoint, postmodernism, and the study of social transactions. Symbolic interactionism and the concept of power. From Jerusalem to Jericho: a study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behaviors. A little pain never hurt anyone: athletic career socialization and the normalization of sports injury. Processes of place attachment: an interactional framework. Studies in symbolic interaction, supplement 2. In: Couch CJ, Saxton SL, Katovich MA, editors. Greenwich: JAI Press 1987.Ĭouch CJ, Saxton SL, Katovich MA. Researching social processes in the laboratory. Symbolic interaction and generic sociological principles. Infrared thermography as a measure of emotion response. Does the self conform to the views of others? Soc Psychol Q. Examining the relationship between deaf identity verification processes and self-esteem. New directions in identity theory and research. Symbols, meaning, and action: the past, present, and future of symbolic interactionism. An autoethnographic analysis of sports identity change. Advancing identity theory: examining the relationship between activated identities and behavior in different social contexts. New York: Oxford University Press 2009.īurke PJ, Tully JC. Trust and commitment through self-verification. Stability and change in the gender identities of newly married couples. Berkeley: University of California Press 1969.īurke PJ. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Upper Saddle River: Pearson 2012.īerger P, Luckmann T. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Symbolic interactionism as a theoretical perspective for multiple method research. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers 2009. Boys in white: student culture in medical school. Spirituality and stripping: exotic dancers narrate the body Ekstasis. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning Publishers 2016.īarton B, Hardesty CL. Does incarceration change the criminal identity? A synthesis of labeling and identity theory perspectives on identity change. Future directions of the perspective are discussed. We address five main methods that are commonly used in symbolic interactionist studies: interviews, surveys, ethnographies, content analysis, and experiments. We discuss how symbolic interactionists employ a wide variety of methods to understand both intra- and interpersonal processes, and how methodological approaches in symbolic interactionism vary in terms of their inductive or deductive style, idiographic or nomothetic causal explanation, and quantitative or qualitative research design. Next, we discuss methods commonly employed by symbolic interactionists, noting how the interactionist perspective informs and guides sociologists in empirical research. We first provide a brief summary of interactionist thought, describing the general tenets and propositions that have defined the perspective over time. In this chapter, we discuss symbolic interactionism as a methodological framework. Symbolic interactionism is theoretical perspective in sociology that addresses the manner in which society is generated and maintained through face-to-face, repeated, meaningful interactions among individuals.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |